EarthNet · planetary intelligence
EarthNet brings different kinds of real-world evidence into one changing picture: seismic activity, volcanic state, severe weather, ocean conditions, environmental pressure, infrastructure context and wider disruption.
Loading the latest public EarthNet snapshot…
A live planetary view
EarthNet keeps those signals in one evidence state without pretending they all mean the same thing. A severe-weather environment, an ocean anomaly and a seismic event remain different claims with different sources, confidence and consequences.
Loading a diverse sample from the latest global snapshot…
Global when you need the horizon. Focused when you need a place.
EarthNet can keep the wide planetary view or narrow attention around a country, region, catchment, asset footprint or other operating area. The exact evidence available changes with geography; the reasoning discipline does not.
The global EarthNet view is useful for seeing developing environmental and human-system context together: severe weather, seismic activity, ocean and cryosphere signals, wildfire, humanitarian pressure and other changing evidence.
New Zealand is EarthNet's current country-level proving ground. The daily state combines seismic activity, volcanic status, incoming weather and ocean context while preserving where the evidence came from and what it does not justify claiming.
New Zealand · daily intelligence
Loading the latest New Zealand interpretation…
EarthNet keeps unusual activity distinct from a predictive claim unless the evidence supports one.
Loading the latest guarded volcanic change…
Separate evidence families, one readable state.
What EarthNet can keep an eye on
Coverage grows as useful sources are validated. EarthNet is deliberately modular, so new evidence can be added without turning every source into the same kind of claim.
Earthquakes, reviewed catalogue changes, official volcanic state and guarded precursor-like measurements without turning anomaly into prediction.
Convective environments, wind, rainfall, heat and later official reports can be followed as developing evidence chains.
Sea-surface temperature, current, wave and ice-region signals provide broader environmental context around developing risk.
Humanitarian consequence, infrastructure pressure and wider disruption can be connected to environmental evidence without becoming tactical tracking.
EarthNet sees the evidence. Prometheus makes the promise.
When the evidence and forecasting policy are strong enough, Prometheus turns the current EarthNet state into a timestamped expectation about what should happen next — then leaves the original forecast untouched while reality decides.
Where EarthNet could matter
The same core problem appears in different organisations: evidence arrives through separate channels, important changes are easy to miss, and the reasoning behind a decision can be difficult to reconstruct later.
Country, portfolio or peril-focused views can connect changing hazard evidence with likely downstream pressure while keeping assumptions visible.
Useful when the question is not simply “is there an alert?” but “what changed, what could it affect, and what are we still unsure about?”
Environmental pressure can be focused around relevant regions, assets and dependencies, with private authorised sources added where appropriate.
EarthNet provides the current state; Prometheus and the wider stack preserve hypotheses, forecasts, alternatives and later outcomes for review.
Underneath EarthNet
The machinery underneath can be sophisticated. The public explanation does not need to be. Keeping these jobs separate is what stops a sensor reading from quietly becoming a causal claim or a scenario from pretending to be a fact.
Acquire, normalise and organise changing real-world evidence into a current state.
Keep source, age, contradiction, missing information and observation quality visible.
Compare mechanisms and competing explanations instead of promoting association into causation.
Commit testable forecasts before outcomes are known, then resolve and calibrate them later.
Compare conditional branches from the same evidence without turning simulated detail into certainty.
Interrogate evidence, reasoning, degraded sources, uncertainty and the assumptions carrying a conclusion.
Country, region or system-specific deployment
A future EarthNet deployment could combine relevant public evidence with authorised private sources, infrastructure context and organisation-specific decision questions. The scope should be built around the real problem rather than forcing every customer into the same dashboard.
Prometheus tells you what might happen. Decision Futures tells you what changes if you act — and what happens if you don't.
When EarthNet surfaces a compound-risk situation with a live Prometheus forecast and plausible human consequence, it opens a Decision Futures candidate. The candidate pre-declares the decision class and the branches — for example, maintain current posture vs. escalate readiness vs. stage resources earlier — before the outcome is known.
If an authorised human opens the trial, both branches are tracked. When the outcome resolves, you see not just whether the forecast was right, but whether the decision changed anything. The counterfactual is preserved. The choice is scored.
Right now: 3 candidates pending. 0 trials opened. The system is waiting.
.jpeg)